• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Ambition IAS

Online IAS Coaching, Preparation, Test Series & Current Affairs

  • KPSC Material
    • General FAQ
    • Books List
      • KAS Prelims Books List
      • KAS Mains Kannada Book List
      • KAS Mains English Book List
    • Free Downloads
      • KAS Prelims Preparation Time table
      • Karnataka Economic Survey (2013-14)
      • Karnataka Economic Survey (2014-15)
      • Previous Question Papers
    • Buy KPSC Prelims Material
      • Buy KAS Prelims Study Material
    • KPSC Mains Study Material
      • KPSC Mains Study Material
  • Mock Tests
    • Prelims Mock Test
      • Free Mock Tests
      • Paid Test Series
    • Mains Mock Test
      • Daily Free Questions (Updated on WhatsApp Group)
      • Paid Test Series
  • Join WhatsApp Group
  • KPSC Mains Test Series
  • UPSC 2015 Prelims MCQs
  • Doubts Corner
  • Contact Us

PIL Challenges Quota for Marathas

June 28, 2014 by Admin Leave a Comment

  • Reservations decision taken to the Maratha community in the Maharashtra cabinet has received challenge in the Bombay High Court by public interest writ petition
  • As per the decision 16 per cent reservation to the Maratha community in government jobs and educational institutions
  • The public interest has filed a petition that government has categorised Marathas as ‘socially and educationally backward,’ which violated the Supreme Court order regarding the total quantum of reservations by doing so
  • The petitioner, Ketan Tirodkar claimed that the community was traditionally powerful and wealthy owning land, sugar co-operatives and co-operative banks in the State
  • Further Mr.Tirodkar pointed that majority of ministers were from the Maratha community and 72% co-operative institutions are controlled by the Marathas
  • PIL stated D.Y. Patil, Patang Kadam, Kamalkishore Kadam, Pawars of Vidya Pratishthan had their “educational empires over thousands and thousands of acres of public land, pocketed from the government under the guise of public interest
  • As per the judgment reservation being extreme form of protective measure or affirmative action that should be confined to minority of seats
  • Though Constitution has no specification the principle of balancing equality ordains [that] reservation of any manner should not go beyond 50 per cent
  • Read at: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/pil-challenges-quota-for-marathas/article6157020.ece

Exams Perspective:

Filed Under: Current Affairs, National

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe To Newsletter





Like us on Facebook

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in